VOGONS


First post, by clb

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hey all,

I got a bit curious to find out more about 70Hz video mode compatibility of different LCD displays, and how prevalent the "well known" Dell 2007 frameskip is, or isn't, with other displays.

The other thread Good 4:3 LCD Monitor has been discussing monitors, and one of the aspects was 70Hz capability, and the known effect of frameskipping 70Hz down to 60Hz.

In that thread, I wrote a test program 70HZ.EXE, which can be used to visually eyeball if a particular display is frameskipping 70Hz down to 60Hz. Maybe we could crowdsource results from a couple of random different LCD panels that people are using, both old and new.

Test scheme:
1. Download https://github.com/juj/crt_terminator/raw/ref … OS/bin/70HZ.zip to your vintage PC.
2. Run 70HZ.EXE
3. Observe whether both conditions take place:

a) White blocks with numbers 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 appear with equal temporal frequency of flicker, and for example none of the blocks are absent some of the time, or all the time. (there is some amount of flicker here for those sensitive to it, apologies for that)
b) the left-to-right panning animations on the blocks below the text are smooth, and not juddering.

If these conditions are ok, then the current display is likely not frameskipping, but is displaying all the 70Hz frames.

If you are not sure, you can press space bar to toggle the tested video mode between 60 Hz and 70 Hz output. If both modes look identically smooth, then the display is likely showing full 70Hz. The 60 Hz output should definitely be smooth on grounds of both a) and b) above. (when toggling to 60hz, there may be garbage pixels shown at bottom of screen, those can be ignored)

Then report your findings as either:

  1. OK (passed conditions a and b above, i.e. displays 70Hz without frameskipping)
  2. Frameskip (displayed the test picture, but did not pass a or b, i.e. likely frameskips down to 60Hz)
  3. No sync (did not even display the test video mode, so cannot sync to 70Hz video)

I'll start:

Year | Display name                | Results   | Display native resolution
-----+-----------------------------+-----------+--------------------------
2003 | Fujitsu-Siemens P19-1 | OK | 1280x1024
2004 | Sony SDM-X73 | OK | 1280x1024
2006 | Dell 2007FPB | Frameskip | 1600x1200
2006 | Dell 2007WFP | Frameskip | 1680x1050
2009 | BenQ ET-0029-B /G2412HD | OK | 1920x1080
2009 | Acer V223w | OK | 1680x1050
2014 | BenQ BL3201PT | No sync | 3840x2160
2014 | HP EliteDisplay E241 | No sync | 1920x1200
2022 | Philips Brilliance 252B9/00 | OK | 1920x1200
2022 | ASUS ProArt PA248QV | OK | 1920x1200

You can see here an example video of how the test appears on Dell 2007 display that exhibits the frameskip: https://youtu.be/p95zPv9kDTk : ASUS PA248QV (left) against Dell 2007FPB (right) (recorded as 60 Hz, though the absent digit 5 in the test can be clearly seen in that recording, which shows the frameskip taking place on the Dell)

When testing, please do not use any video scaler or converter, like OSSC, RetroTink, or other, as that can skew the result (or if you do, please explicitly mention).

Reply 1 of 56, by pan069

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Display name: NEC Multisync P212
Year: 2016?
Results: Frameskip
Display native resolution: 1600x1200

Input tested: VGA D-SUB

Reply 2 of 56, by pan069

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Display name: NEC AccuSync LCD51V
Year: 2004?
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 1024x768

Input tested: VGA D-SUB

Reply 3 of 56, by pan069

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Display name: Dell U2520D
Year: 2020?
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 2560x1440

Input tested: HDMI through OSSC

Reply 4 of 56, by Tiido

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Name: Samsung Syncmaster 204B
Year: 2006 august
Results: OK
Native resolution: 1600x1200
Input tested: VGA

T-04YBSC, a new YMF71x based sound card & Official VOGONS thread about it
Newly made 4MB 60ns 30pin SIMMs ~
mida sa loed ? nagunii aru ei saa 😜

Reply 5 of 56, by clb

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Thanks for testing! The Syncmaster 204B is very interesting to see that it supports both the 4:3 1600x1200, and smooth 70Hz input. Makes me want to get one in my lab to test with CRT Terminator. How does it do as a retro monitor otherwise?

Reply 6 of 56, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I suspect it does 70Hz due to 6-bit+FRC panel, so it's something to consider for games beyond DOS era.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 7 of 56, by Tiido

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Yeah, it is 18bit / 6bit per channel with temporal dithering.

clb wrote on 2024-12-26, 14:24:

Thanks for testing! The Syncmaster 204B is very interesting to see that it supports both the 4:3 1600x1200, and smooth 70Hz input. Makes me want to get one in my lab to test with CRT Terminator. How does it do as a retro monitor otherwise?

It has the usual issue of 720 vs 320/640 pixels differentiation over VGA, and being a TN panel it has awful contrast and lot of motion blur but it is able to display all the DOS games I have tried, including Pinball Fantasies and Jazz Jackrabbit.
However, the Nokia 445ZA CRT next to it on my desk wipes all the floors and ceilings with it as far as gaming performance goes *kinescope master race* 🤣

T-04YBSC, a new YMF71x based sound card & Official VOGONS thread about it
Newly made 4MB 60ns 30pin SIMMs ~
mida sa loed ? nagunii aru ei saa 😜

Reply 8 of 56, by vetz

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
clb wrote on 2024-12-26, 14:24:

Thanks for testing! The Syncmaster 204B is very interesting to see that it supports both the 4:3 1600x1200, and smooth 70Hz input. Makes me want to get one in my lab to test with CRT Terminator. How does it do as a retro monitor otherwise?

Its a very convenient display as its has very good compatibility with different cards/ strange display modes and a dedicated auto adjust button.

I dont agree it has alot of motion blur as mentioned by Tiido. I got one of these brand new back in 2005 and one of the selling points was the low response rate at 5ms which was ideal for gaming.

3D Accelerated Games List (Proprietary APIs - No 3DFX/Direct3D)
3D Acceleration Comparison Episodes

Reply 9 of 56, by clb

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Tiido wrote on 2024-12-26, 15:39:

It has the usual issue of 720 vs 320/640 pixels differentiation over VGA

This would fortunately be a non-issue for use with CRT Terminator, as long as the display is able to robustly sync to different video resolutions. Hmm, maybe I'll try to find one to test.

Reply 10 of 56, by Tiido

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Yeah, that should be the main selling point of your device, ability to defeat 640/320 vs 720 issues. The rest is icing on the cake 🤣

vetz wrote on 2024-12-26, 15:42:

I dont agree it has alot of motion blur as mentioned by Tiido. I got one of these brand new back in 2005 and one of the selling points was the low response rate at 5ms which was ideal for gaming.

That 5ms is only processing latency, from input to display panel. Actual panel response is *tens* of milliseconds to go from white to black or opposite, and that is true for vast majority of LCD panels.

T-04YBSC, a new YMF71x based sound card & Official VOGONS thread about it
Newly made 4MB 60ns 30pin SIMMs ~
mida sa loed ? nagunii aru ei saa 😜

Reply 11 of 56, by darry

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Tiido wrote on 2024-12-26, 15:39:
Yeah, it is 18bit / 6bit per channel with temporal dithering. […]
Show full quote

Yeah, it is 18bit / 6bit per channel with temporal dithering.

clb wrote on 2024-12-26, 14:24:

Thanks for testing! The Syncmaster 204B is very interesting to see that it supports both the 4:3 1600x1200, and smooth 70Hz input. Makes me want to get one in my lab to test with CRT Terminator. How does it do as a retro monitor otherwise?

It has the usual issue of 720 vs 320/640 pixels differentiation over VGA, and being a TN panel it has awful contrast and lot of motion blur but it is able to display all the DOS games I have tried, including Pinball Fantasies and Jazz Jackrabbit.
However, the Nokia 445ZA CRT next to it on my desk wipes all the floors and ceilings with it as far as gaming performance goes *kinescope master race* 🤣

The panel on at least some of those seems to degrade, as was discussed previously. Has yours gotten worse since that time ?

Questions about LCD panel failure modes

Reply 13 of 56, by rasva

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Out of curiosity I tried Pocket 386 internal lcd display.
Year of manufacture 2024
Result is OK.
Native resolutin 800x480? (I guess)

Will test more later....

Reply 14 of 56, by scj312

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Display name: Dell 1908FP
Year: 2008?
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 1280x1024

Reply 15 of 56, by scj312

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Display name: Dell 1703FP
Year: 2004?
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 1280x1024

Reply 16 of 56, by pan069

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Display name: Eizo Flexscan S1934
Year: 2023
Results: Frameskip
Display native resolution: 1280x1024

Input tested: VGA D-SUB

Reply 17 of 56, by pan069

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Display name: Eizo Flexscan L768
Year: Aug 2005
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 1280x1024

Input tested: VGA D-SUB

(I was surprised by this one 😀 )

Reply 18 of 56, by rasva

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Display name: AOC 24G1WG4
Year: 2018
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 1920x1080

Input tested: VGA D-SUB

Reply 19 of 56, by rasva

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Display name: DELL U2312HDM
Year: 2011
Results: OK
Display native resolution: 1920x1080

Input tested: VGA D-SUB