PhilsComputerLab wrote:Carlos S. M. wrote:
Yea, the Intel was easier as it went straight from AGP 478 to PCIe 775. Whereas with AMD there was AGP 754 and 939. Then PCIe 754 and 939, and then they went with AM2.
I think I will do videos on the 939 AGP stuff, single core, and then move straight to AM2 vs 775 with a faster PCIe graphics. But I digress.
Well, if you will compare 939 against AM2, i would recoming using both single and dual core 939 CPUs, as well with both AGP and PCI-E 939 systems, since 939 era was mostly PCI-E during their lifetime plus you can compare 939 vs AM2 directly using the same videocard, also you are comparing agaist Intel as well (Intel's counterpart for 939 and AM2 were mainly PCI-E based except for the earlier Socket 478 prescott systems with AGP and 875/865 series chipset).
I remember in Anandtech's review of Socket AM2, they compared the highest end Athlon 64 FX for AM2 (FX-62) vs the highest end dual core 939 Athlon FX (FX-60) and the Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 (http://www.anandtech.com/show/2012/8)
939 rivals were:
(Single Core)
Pentium 4 Prescott (Socket 478)
Pentium 4 500 and 600 series (LGA 775)
(Dual Core)
Pentium D 800 series like 820, 830, 840...
Pentium D 900 series like 940, 950, 960..
AM2 main rivals were (i said before, but i forgot 1 CPU):
Pentium D 900 series like 940, 950, 960..
Pentium Extreme Edition 955 and 965
Core 2 Extreme x6800
Core 2 Duo E6xxx
Core 2 Duo E4xxx