rick6 wrote:That's a sweet system you got there. what games are you going to run on it?
Also be kind enough to post some benchmark scores if […]
Show full quote
That's a sweet system you got there. what games are you going to run on it?
Also be kind enough to post some benchmark scores if you don't mind 😀
Btw a electrostatic discharge most likely won't be noticed by you and won't kill your hardware right away, it just may decrease it's life span. Most people say they never had a problem with electrostatic discharge because they won't keep their hardware for long enough to notice, but nevermind this now. We can see that you know what you're doing and it's not like your rubbing yourself nor your hardware on carpets. Plus that procedure of yours about discharging yourself on the chassis from time to time even though it isn't perfect it's pretty much okay, i do that myself as well.
Ironic that you're using a Geforce 6800 Ultra as i just started a thread about what would be a fair price for one.
I don't know what a fair price would be today, but I scored mine for $35 on ebay last summer, 2013. There was a seller on ebay selling them as new-old-stock and had a lot of them, but it's long gone and all sold out now. Mine being the BFG's "OC Edition", takes a minor software overclock to run at the "6800 Ultra Extreme" speeds of the slightly higher GPU just fine. The "extreme" version of the 6800 ultra is essentially 100% the exact same as the 6800 ultra, it's just clocked a little higher. See over here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nv … 86xxx.29_Series
If you like I can try and get some benchmark scores out of it a little later tonight or tomorrow and I'll post here. One benchmark score I do have on record already is over here: http://hwbot.org/submission/2548469_kithylin_ … agp_26083_marks That benchmark was run in windows XP though, scored 26k and I've since then found out that Windows 2000 runs faster, and then I've loaded Omega Drivers in windows 2000 and pulled out 30k instead last night.. I didn't record it though. I have a lot on my plate today and I might get to it tomorrow and do some more tests for you.
obobskivich wrote:Very nice looking machine, and I dig the attention to details for the "era" (like not putting a Radeon 3850 in there). Out of curiosity did the board not have a retention mechanism for the CPU, or did you have to remove it for compatibility? (I vaguely remember 754 having a similar plastic "bracket" like 939 does)
Also, what case is that? (it looks simple; simple is good)
Aye, I know there are faster AGP cards, but I wanted it to be "the fastest ever for 2005" sort of.. so I stuck with a 6800 ultra, which was mostly period-appropriate. The board did have a retention mechanism for the CPU, however that is designed for the normal desktop CPU's for this platform, that have the IHS / Heat Spreader metal cap on top. Which adds about.. 5mm or 10mm of height to the top of the silicon for the heat-sink to mount on. This chip, while technically being the fastest ever produced for socket 754, was originally designed for laptops, so has no IHS / Heat Spreader on top. And as such, if I stuck with the original heat-sink mounting design, the heat-sinks would of sat 10mm off the top of the chip and not even made contact. So I had to come up with my own mounting design, and once I figured it out.. I thought I'd share how I worked it out so others might get an idea how to do the same thing.
For comparison, here's what a "normal" desktop chip for this socket looks like, compare it to the photos of my 4000+ chip above (This is a random image I found in google):
Also as to the case, this is an Antec Three Hundred.