VOGONS


What retro activity did you get up to today?

Topic actions

Reply 23260 of 28974, by Shreddoc

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ideally, don't use a type of brake cleaner which contains tetrachloroethylene. It may vary by country, but some say the CRC red cans have it, while others may not.

Supporter of PicoGUS, PicoMEM, mt32-pi, WavetablePi, Throttle Blaster, Voltage Blaster, GBS-Control, GP2040-CE, RetroNAS.

Reply 23261 of 28974, by MarkP

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Shreddoc wrote on 2022-11-26, 04:50:

Ideally, don't use a type of brake cleaner which contains tetrachloroethylene. It may vary by country, but some say the CRC red cans have it, while others may not.

So what?

I use various crc products ALL the time. A number of crc product have red cans so what one specifically are you actually referring too....?

I thought geeks were ment to be intelligent folk? Maybe, but those that have post complete rubbish regarding cleaning computer boards are not smart or have any common sense or interpersonal communication skills.

Reply 23262 of 28974, by Shreddoc

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

You will need to do your own research to determine which particular brake cleaner products contain tetrachloroethylene, if you consider it's dangers worthy of avoidance.

People who value good health (of themselves, their families, and the environment) will tend to avoid the indiscriminate long term usage of tetrachloroethylene products, based upon scientific consensus, such as that I posted directly above in links.

I hope you haven't been unknowingly using tetrachloroethylene products all this time, Mark P. But it sounds as though I'm unlikely to convince you about anything at this stage, so my warnings about the substance are primarily for the community's sake.

Supporter of PicoGUS, PicoMEM, mt32-pi, WavetablePi, Throttle Blaster, Voltage Blaster, GBS-Control, GP2040-CE, RetroNAS.

Reply 23263 of 28974, by MarkP

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Shreddoc wrote on 2022-11-26, 06:48:

You will need to do your own research to determine which particular brake cleaner products contain tetrachloroethylene, if you consider it's dangers worthy of avoidance.

People who value good health (of themselves, their families, and the environment) will tend to avoid the indiscriminate long term usage of tetrachloroethylene products, based upon scientific consensus, such as that I posted directly above in links.

I hope you haven't been unknowingly using tetrachloroethylene products all this time, Mark P. But it sounds as though I'm unlikely to convince you about anything at this stage, so my warnings about the substance are primarily for the community's sake.

You really really are on a different planet dude. Go hug a tree.

Most members here can make up there own own minds what to use to clean their computer related boards.

Reply 23264 of 28974, by Shreddoc

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yes, my belief in not routinely spraying my computer boards with carcinogenic brake cleaner sure does make me a "extreme greeny tree hugger". 🤣 🤣

Supporter of PicoGUS, PicoMEM, mt32-pi, WavetablePi, Throttle Blaster, Voltage Blaster, GBS-Control, GP2040-CE, RetroNAS.

Reply 23265 of 28974, by MarkP

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Back on topic you lot..

Got myself a gas less mig welder and am repairing/adapting an early '70 Honda 500/4 to fit on my new project motorbike, a 1983 GS550M Katana. A fairly easy job really. It uses that terrible stuff called petrol for it's 4 stroke engine to propel it forward. Neat ah?

You can drink it and sniff it but it wont do your health any good and most likely will die eventually. It's toxic, combustible and very very easy to set alight. Yes I live dangerously.\

Trees can kill you if you hit one at speed. I suggest cutting down all the trees to prevent this from happening to you or the ones you love.

This is a community safety notice bought to you by the letters D,U and M and the number 1.
This post was proudly sponsored my garden gnomes.

Last edited by MarkP on 2022-11-26, 09:57. Edited 2 times in total.

Reply 23266 of 28974, by libby

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

been working at slowly moving a portion of my inventory/collection/hoard/whatever one wants to call it, to the storage garage this past week

The attachment g1.jpg is no longer available
The attachment g2.jpg is no longer available
The attachment g3.jpg is no longer available
The attachment g4.jpg is no longer available
The attachment g5.jpg is no longer available

goal's to eventually get the garage holding most of the machines and larger items like power supplies, while the loose cards/laptop stuff are at my apartment. the garage currently holds about 40% of what I own by volume.

probably 2/3 of this is stuff accumulated from e-waste.

Reply 23267 of 28974, by bjwil1991

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Did some testing on the Kalok KL-330 hard drive. No bad sectors, no defects, and it has a pretty damn great interleave at 1:1, which means it takes 1 cycle to read 1 track. Plus, its track-to-track time is 9.13ms, which is pretty damn fast for an RLL drive.

I parked the drive and it'll go to a new home once I get materials to protect the drive, the controller card, and the cables.

Discord: https://discord.gg/U5dJw7x
Systems from the Compaq Portable 1 to Ryzen 9 5950X
Twitch: https://twitch.tv/retropcuser

Reply 23268 of 28974, by Turbo ->

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
libby wrote on 2022-11-26, 08:29:

been working at slowly moving a portion of my inventory/collection/hoard/whatever one wants to call it, to the storage garage this past week

That looks like heaven to me 😀 Very nice collection you have there. Will keep you busy tinkering with old systems for quite some time.

Reply 23269 of 28974, by fool

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
libby wrote on 2022-11-26, 08:29:

been working at slowly moving a portion of my inventory/collection/hoard/whatever one wants to call it, to the storage garage this past week

goal's to eventually get the garage holding most of the machines and larger items like power supplies, while the loose cards/laptop stuff are at my apartment. the garage currently holds about 40% of what I own by volume.

probably 2/3 of this is stuff accumulated from e-waste.

That would be fun to explore but not necessarily to own. This is like peer support in a way because my "collection" no more looks as bad as yesterday.

I've been working in totally different scale. Now planning to buy a real microscope.

Toshiba T8500 desktop
SAM/CS9233 Wavetable Synthesizer daughterboard
Coming: 40-pin 8MB SIMM kit, CS4232 ISA wavetable sound card

Reply 23270 of 28974, by Hippo486

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Built a Socket 7 Pentium VRM today. It uses some prototype board, a 15+15 RA connector and a Chinese special '20A' Buck Converter. I think 20A is wildly optimistic, but it should be find for what the motherboard (GA-586ATM/P 66Mhz FSB) can handle. Had to go with a 12V input as the chip/circuit they used on the buck converter gets a little weird if the Input/Output differential is too small.

Early testing is good, computer boots and is stable. Longer testing is required though to see how it performs with other CPUs. End goal I suppose is to get a K6-2 running in this board, 2.0/6.0 multi at 66 FSB.

If nothing else it keeps me busy 😁

Reply 23271 of 28974, by GigAHerZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
GigAHerZ wrote on 2022-04-23, 14:45:

Got this!

External SCSI SyQuest 230MB 3.5" drive. Full set, will archive the floppies unless they are already archived.

For whatever reason, it also seems to include coincidentally 230MB MO disk. I have an internal 650MB MO drive - i wonder, if it would work with that?

At last i got to it to check if it actually works as i had the bench computer with SCSI controller up and running... and it does!
My first experience with "removable hdd platter storage medium"! 😁 It even sounds like an HDD!

I have one disk and it seems to be okay.

"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - And i intend to get every last bit out of it even after loading every damn driver!

Reply 23272 of 28974, by libby

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Turbo -> wrote on 2022-11-26, 11:59:
libby wrote on 2022-11-26, 08:29:

been working at slowly moving a portion of my inventory/collection/hoard/whatever one wants to call it, to the storage garage this past week

That looks like heaven to me 😀 Very nice collection you have there. Will keep you busy tinkering with old systems for quite some time.

haha yeah I have enough stuff to last about three or more years full time at this point, but it's grown to a degree where it's entering "hoarders" TV show range, so I am more cautious about buying large lots of stuff now.

Reply 23273 of 28974, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Upgraded my 'Ultimate' Windows XP build with this Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen 3 motherboard, i7-3770k CPU, and 2x2GB DDR3 RAM.

Based on the performance gains so far, I'm finally making better use of the 980 Ti I have installed in this machine. 😁

Last edited by Shponglefan on 2022-11-26, 20:16. Edited 1 time in total.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 23274 of 28974, by Hippo486

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Hippo486 wrote on 2022-11-26, 15:54:

Built a Socket 7 Pentium VRM today. It uses some prototype board, a 15+15 RA connector and a Chinese special '20A' Buck Converter. I think 20A is wildly optimistic, but it should be find for what the motherboard (GA-586ATM/P 66Mhz FSB) can handle. Had to go with a 12V input as the chip/circuit they used on the buck converter gets a little weird if the Input/Output differential is too small.

Early testing is good, computer boots and is stable. Longer testing is required though to see how it performs with other CPUs. End goal I suppose is to get a K6-2 running in this board, 2.0/6.0 multi at 66 FSB.

If nothing else it keeps me busy 😁

Further testing, I've had both a K6-2 and K6-3 running in this board now, thanks to the VRM. (6 x 66Mhz / 400Mhz, using a 2x multi on the board), with the K6-3 being the better performer.

The BIOS for the board has absolutely no clue what the CPU is (to be expected) and amusingly reports the CPU to be a 486DX2-66 😁 so the K6 Dos tools/drivers may help me eek a little more performance still.

Quite pleased considering I started with a Pentium 100 on this board, then a Pentium MMX overdrive @ 200Mhz and now with the new VRM a K6-3 @ 400Mhz.

Reply 23275 of 28974, by MarkP

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Hippo486 wrote on 2022-11-26, 20:16:
Further testing, I've had both a K6-2 and K6-3 running in this board now, thanks to the VRM. (6 x 66Mhz / 400Mhz, using a 2x mul […]
Show full quote
Hippo486 wrote on 2022-11-26, 15:54:

Built a Socket 7 Pentium VRM today. It uses some prototype board, a 15+15 RA connector and a Chinese special '20A' Buck Converter. I think 20A is wildly optimistic, but it should be find for what the motherboard (GA-586ATM/P 66Mhz FSB) can handle. Had to go with a 12V input as the chip/circuit they used on the buck converter gets a little weird if the Input/Output differential is too small.

Early testing is good, computer boots and is stable. Longer testing is required though to see how it performs with other CPUs. End goal I suppose is to get a K6-2 running in this board, 2.0/6.0 multi at 66 FSB.

If nothing else it keeps me busy 😁

Further testing, I've had both a K6-2 and K6-3 running in this board now, thanks to the VRM. (6 x 66Mhz / 400Mhz, using a 2x multi on the board), with the K6-3 being the better performer.

The BIOS for the board has absolutely no clue what the CPU is (to be expected) and amusingly reports the CPU to be a 486DX2-66 😁 so the K6 Dos tools/drivers may help me eek a little more performance still.

Quite pleased considering I started with a Pentium 100 on this board, then a Pentium MMX overdrive @ 200Mhz and now with the new VRM a K6-3 @ 400Mhz.

Good stuff!

Reply 23276 of 28974, by Socket3

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I was looking through a lot of more modern machines I picked up for free from an institution. Mostly low end core 2 duo and AM2 machines - good source of disk drives and DDR2, the latter of which I oddly have very little of - and decided (out of boredom) to try and install windows 98 on one of them.

I picked out a Core 2 Duo e4400 with 2GB of DDR2 and a Gigabyte i945 mainboard. I took off half of the ram, put a PCI-E Geforce 6600GT in it and to my surprise, windows 98 SE installed and ran perfectly! I even managed to partition the SATA 160gb disk drive using win98's fdisk, despite it incorrectly reporting total disk size as 20gb instead of 160gb, by using the percentage trick. I wanted an 8gb partition for win98 and typed down 5% - and voila! Oh and I installed PATCHMEM at first boot to avoid the "out of memory" error.

The attachment 2.jpeg is no longer available
The attachment 3.jpeg is no longer available

I did encounter an issue when installing the graphics card... I managed to install intel's chipset drivers and dx8 just fine, and when I got to the graphics driver (66.93 - earliest driver that supports the 6600gt) it somehow installed the 6600 along side the "standard graphics adapter" that installed with the OS, as such the 6600 driver was allocated no resources and showed up with an exclamation mark in device manager. I had to manually remove both drivers and restart the PC. After doing that, it detected the monitor but was still in 16 color mode. I switched to 16 bit 800x600, restarted and it everything worked as it should. The video card is even detected as PCI-E 16x in the nvidia control panel.

These kinds of builds are great for someone just getting into the hobby. A cheap or freebee PC like this, paired with a supported PCI sound card (in my case a Yamaha DS-XG) an a PCI-E card with windows 98 driers (Radeon x300/x600/x700/x800 and nvidia 6200/6600/6800) makes for an easy way of playing retro games on real hardware. It can of course even dual-boot windows XP.

Next up - clean up the garage!!!..... yeah...

Reply 23277 of 28974, by HanSolo

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
MarkP wrote on 2022-11-26, 07:11:
Shreddoc wrote on 2022-11-26, 06:48:

You will need to do your own research to determine which particular brake cleaner products contain tetrachloroethylene, if you consider it's dangers worthy of avoidance.

People who value good health (of themselves, their families, and the environment) will tend to avoid the indiscriminate long term usage of tetrachloroethylene products, based upon scientific consensus, such as that I posted directly above in links.

I hope you haven't been unknowingly using tetrachloroethylene products all this time, Mark P. But it sounds as though I'm unlikely to convince you about anything at this stage, so my warnings about the substance are primarily for the community's sake.

You really really are on a different planet dude. Go hug a tree.

Most members here can make up there own own minds what to use to clean their computer related boards.

Not everybody is an expert on everything. And open forums are not only read by its members.
So I appreciate the warning about brake cleaners.

Reply 23278 of 28974, by PcBytes

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Socket3 wrote on 2022-11-27, 10:59:
I was looking through a lot of more modern machines I picked up for free from an institution. Mostly low end core 2 duo and AM2 […]
Show full quote

I was looking through a lot of more modern machines I picked up for free from an institution. Mostly low end core 2 duo and AM2 machines - good source of disk drives and DDR2, the latter of which I oddly have very little of - and decided (out of boredom) to try and install windows 98 on one of them.

I picked out a Core 2 Duo e4400 with 2GB of DDR2 and a Gigabyte i945 mainboard. I took off half of the ram, put a PCI-E Geforce 6600GT in it and to my surprise, windows 98 SE installed and ran perfectly! I even managed to partition the SATA 160gb disk drive using win98's fdisk, despite it incorrectly reporting total disk size as 20gb instead of 160gb, by using the percentage trick. I wanted an 8gb partition for win98 and typed down 5% - and voila! Oh and I installed PATCHMEM at first boot to avoid the "out of memory" error.

2.jpeg

3.jpeg

I did encounter an issue when installing the graphics card... I managed to install intel's chipset drivers and dx8 just fine, and when I got to the graphics driver (66.93 - earliest driver that supports the 6600gt) it somehow installed the 6600 along side the "standard graphics adapter" that installed with the OS, as such the 6600 driver was allocated no resources and showed up with an exclamation mark in device manager. I had to manually remove both drivers and restart the PC. After doing that, it detected the monitor but was still in 16 color mode. I switched to 16 bit 800x600, restarted and it everything worked as it should. The video card is even detected as PCI-E 16x in the nvidia control panel.

These kinds of builds are great for someone just getting into the hobby. A cheap or freebee PC like this, paired with a supported PCI sound card (in my case a Yamaha DS-XG) an a PCI-E card with windows 98 driers (Radeon x300/x600/x700/x800 and nvidia 6200/6600/6800) makes for an easy way of playing retro games on real hardware. It can of course even dual-boot windows XP.

Next up - clean up the garage!!!..... yeah...

Should I feel proud that I own a similar Delux case? 🤣

Granted, mine surprisingly came with a K8T800 Pro based Sempron machine, of all things that it could hide in it.

"Enter at your own peril, past the bolted door..."
Main PC: i5 3470, GB B75M-D3H, 16GB RAM, 2x1TB
98SE : P3 650, Soyo SY-6BA+IV, 384MB RAM, 80GB

Reply 23279 of 28974, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Ugh, not my best day today...

Got a lot of 6 early VLB cards with obscure IIT/Xtec AGX016A chips on them. Reputedly slow XGA-clones, but actually support higher graphics modes with >1MB RAM, so interesting nonetheless - and 6 VLB cards that didn't cost me at least a single kidney isn't at all bad in any case. Assuming they work of course.

So I dusted off my VLB test bench (Cyrix 5x86-100 on a UMC-based board) and - nothing, not even with the original Cirrus Logic CL-GD5428 in it. Bugger. Test system died on me. Tested my early PCI tet bench (Cyrix 5x86-100 on a UMC PCI-based board, for nice 1:1 comparisons) which fortunately did work without issues. Swapped out PSUs and RAM: nope, both work in the PCI set, not VLB. So swapped CPU. Good news: both CPUs still fine. Bad news: must be the motherboard then.

Worse news: broke the little plastic clips holding the heatsink onto one of the 5x86s while doing that. So now have a board to fix and a new clip to source or bodge. And I still don't know if these VLB cards do anything.

Fortunately I do have alternatives, another VLB-based 486 system running my old sound cards and a Pentium VLB system, but both are built into irritting AT minitowers with cables out the back that are hard to reach. Oh, and there's my Alaris Leopard 2, which is in a NOS case (generic, not IBM) in its original packaging at the back of the cupboard waiting for suitable display options. Come to think of it, that would be the ideal pairing with an early, oddball card. It would however require the card to run happily in 16b VLB mode. Oh well, time to get digging and testing.