VOGONS


First post, by mpe

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Sorted out my original issues. Looking for help with identifying vendor and model of this motherboard:

VSr9ZgV.jpg

Intel 420EX (Aries) Socket 3.

There was only a handful of Aries board apart from Intel Ninja AFAIK and unlike most of them this one doesn't seem to be based on the reference design (namely 4 SIMM slots, PS/2 mouse onboard, >33 MHz support, etc.)

The only visible identifiers on the board are these:
150-0061-001 REV C
QP1uLgb.jpg

BIOS chip (AMI WinBios dated 07/25/1994)
0Nf9Zu8.jpg

POST screen:
41-0702-428007-072594-ARIES-P
qWt4Vx3.jpg

They seem to be using S prefixes for jumpers (S1, S2, ...). Fortunately, everything seems to be well described on the board.

Blog|NexGen 586|S4

Reply 1 of 9, by PC Hoarder Patrol

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Seems AMI aren't much help

The attachment AMI BIOS Strings.png is no longer available

and whoever it is, their only other board, 40-0203-428007-00101111-060692-AR810: ??? (Model 3/486 ) (Chipset: SIRUS AR-810 ISA) is also unidentified.

Reply 2 of 9, by perhenden

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I have one too. On mine, the S/N area appears to be blank, but with a sticker on top off it. The sticker says "Warranty void if broken o 3912". Otherwise nothing to add. My guess is that this is an industrial board.

Reply 3 of 9, by douglar

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

What is the part number in the top right corner by the l2 cache?

Looks like a nice board, other than the missing floppy drive header.

Reply 4 of 9, by explorerdotexe

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
mpe wrote on 2020-01-13, 21:25:
Sorted out my original issues. Looking for help with identifying vendor and model of this motherboard: […]
Show full quote

Sorted out my original issues. Looking for help with identifying vendor and model of this motherboard:

VSr9ZgV.jpg

Intel 420EX (Aries) Socket 3.

There was only a handful of Aries board apart from Intel Ninja AFAIK and unlike most of them this one doesn't seem to be based on the reference design (namely 4 SIMM slots, PS/2 mouse onboard, >33 MHz support, etc.)

The only visible identifiers on the board are these:
150-0061-001 REV C
QP1uLgb.jpg

BIOS chip (AMI WinBios dated 07/25/1994)
0Nf9Zu8.jpg

POST screen:
41-0702-428007-072594-ARIES-P
qWt4Vx3.jpg

They seem to be using S prefixes for jumpers (S1, S2, ...). Fortunately, everything seems to be well described on the board.

Nice board! As for the ID, i tried looking to see if the string had any clue of a manufacturer (which is usually located in the part after "0702-42") but nothing came up, and the board has no indication of a manufacturer/name on it. So this still likely remains an unknown board. By the way, would you mind dumping the BIOS of this board if possible? Thanks.

Last edited by explorerdotexe on 2021-09-12, 08:51. Edited 2 times in total.

Fresh off playing Pinball on the school computers.

Reply 5 of 9, by chublord

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

This is the first time I've seen this chipset. Very cool, how does it perform vs the contemporary SiS, UMC, and Opti chipsets?

IBM Valuepoint 486 DX4-100, Opti 802G, 50 MHz FSB, Voodoo1+S3 864, Quantum Fireball EX 4.0 GB, Seagate Medalist 1.6 GB, 128 MB FPM, 256k L2

Reply 6 of 9, by jakethompson1

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
chublord wrote on 2021-09-11, 22:00:

This is the first time I've seen this chipset. Very cool, how does it perform vs the contemporary SiS, UMC, and Opti chipsets?

I've always understood that prior to the Triton, choosing an Intel chipset would only be for "nobody got fired for buying IBM" situations--i.e. nothing spectacular about them and maybe even worse performance than the competitive ones.

Reply 7 of 9, by explorerdotexe

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
jakethompson1 wrote on 2021-09-11, 22:12:
chublord wrote on 2021-09-11, 22:00:

This is the first time I've seen this chipset. Very cool, how does it perform vs the contemporary SiS, UMC, and Opti chipsets?

I've always understood that prior to the Triton, choosing an Intel chipset would only be for "nobody got fired for buying IBM" situations--i.e. nothing spectacular about them and maybe even worse performance than the competitive ones.

Intel chipsets, although present in the 486 era, weren't actually that commonly used until around Socket 4/5.

Fresh off playing Pinball on the school computers.

Reply 8 of 9, by pentiumspeed

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Intel did some chipsets for 386SX and 386DX boards. Not counting the cache controllers (385SX, 385DX and 395DX) chipset intel also produced.

Cheers,

Great Northern aka Canada.